Tag Archives: Dmitri Shostakovich

In concert – English Symphony Orchestra / Kenneth Woods @ Kings Place: Elgar, Truscott, Fribbins, Weinberg & Shostakovich

Posted on by
Reply

Laura Jellicoe (flute), Rosemary Cow (bassoon), Rosalind Ventris (viola), English Symphony Orchestra / Kenneth Woods

Elgar Romance in D minor Op.62 (1910)
Truscott Elegy in E flat major (1944) [London premiere]
Fribbins Folk Songs (2022) [London premiere]
Weinberg Flute Concerto no.1 in D minor Op.75 (1961)
Shostakovich arr. Barshai Chamber Symphony in A flat major Op.118a (1964, arr. 1971)

Kings Place, London
Sunday 23 March 2025

Reviewed by Richard Whitehouse

What has become the English Symphony Orchestra’s annual appearance in London Chamber Music Society’s season saw an appealing programme of (relatively) familiar and (relatively) unfamiliar British and Soviet-era music as wide ranging as it had been carefully assembled.

It cannot often have begun a concert, but the Romance that Elgar wrote for bassoonist Edwin James made an attractive entrée – its pathos and eloquence fully conveyed by ESO principal Rosamary Cow, always heard to advantage against the strings’ warmly ruminative backdrop.

Harold Truscott finished only three works for orchestra, his Elegy for strings the undoubted masterpiece – eliding intuitively between the already burgeoning British lineage with that of Central Europe (Dvořák’s crepuscular Nocturne, heard at last year’s ESO concert, affords an interesting precedent). Despite its major-key grounding, this is music of intense while often anguished emotion – Truscott bearing his soul to a degree he was rarely, if ever, to do again. As in Worcester four seasons ago, Kenneth Woods searched out its every expressive nuance.

Concertante pieces have featured prominently in Peter Fribbins’s output, with Folk Songs the most recent example. Those traditional tunes range widely geographically and expressively – the Prelude drawing on Welsh melody Bugail Yr Hafod (When I was a Shepherd) in soulful restraint, the Fugue on Serbian tune Ajde Jano (C’mon Jana) in animated dexterity, then the Fantasia on Hungarian song Azt gondoltam eső esik (I thought it rains) in elegant profundity. Superbly played by Rosalind Ventris, it makes a welcome addition to a still-limited repertoire.

Hardly less valuable in its own context is the First Flute Concerto by Mieczysław Weinberg. Written for Alexander Korneyev, its modest proportions fairly belie its substance – whether the energetic interplay of its opening Allegro, the deftly understated threnody of its Adagio, or the whimsical humour of an Allegro anticipating numerous Weinberg finales. It was also the ideal showcase for ESO principal Laura Jellicoe to demonstrate her solo prowess, with ESO strings responding ably to what must be among its composer’s most performed pieces.

Dedicated to Weinberg and written over just 11 days, Shostakovich’s Tenth String Quartet is something of a standalone in the composer’s cycle – coming between four innately personal quartets and four dedicated to each member of the Beethoven Quartet. Yet it is music no less focussed in intent and Rudolf Barshai’s arrangement for string orchestra defines its character more markedly – not least the winsome ambivalence of its initial Andante or visceral force of its ‘furioso’ scherzo, the ESO players tackling those fearsome rhythmic unisons head on. The cellos came into their own with the emotionally restrained variations of the Adagio before, its link seamlessly effected, the final Allegretto built methodically if inexorably to a heightened restatement of the passacaglia’s theme before tentatively retracing its steps to a wistful close.

An impressive demonstration overall of the ESO’s prowess and, moreover, the ideal way to close 17 seasons of LCMS recitals at Kings Place. September finds this series relocating to the newly refurbished St John’s Church at Waterloo, ready for a new chapter in its existence.

Visit the English Symphony Orchestra website to read more about the orchestra, and click on the artist names to read more about flautist Laura Jellicoe, bassoonist Rosemary Cow, viola player Rosalind Ventris and conductor Kenneth Woods. Click also to read more on composers Peter Fribbins and Harold Truscott

Published post no.2,483 – Monday 24 March 2025

In concert – Quatuor Danel: Shostakovich & Weinberg #9 with François-Frédéric Guy @ Wigmore Hall

Posted on by
Reply

François-Frédéric Guy (piano), Quatuor Danel [Marc Danel & Gilles Millet (violins), Vlad Bogdanas (viola), Yovan Markovitch (cello)]

Weinberg String Quartet no.13 Op.118 (1977)
Shostakovich String Quartet no.13 in B flat minor Op.138 (1970)
Shostakovich Piano Quintet in G minor Op.57 (1940)

Wigmore Hall, London
Thursday 6 March 2025

by Richard Whitehouse Photos (c) Marco Borggreve (Quatuor Danel), Lyodoh Kaneko (François-Frédéric Guy)

Quatuor Danel’s cycle at Wigmore Hall focussing on the string quartets of Shostakovich and Weinberg continued this evening with the Thirteenth Quartets by both composers, alongside the Piano Quintet that has long been among the former’s most representative chamber works.

After his exploratory (while not a little disconcerting) Twelfth Quartet, Weinberg avoided the medium for several years before penning four such pieces in relatively swift succession. Cast in a single movement of barely 15 minutes the Thirteenth Quartet, the shortest of his cycle, is influenced as much by Shostakovich’s late quartets as Weinberg’s own precedents. Facets of sonata form underpin its reticent progress from uncertain inwardness to unwilling animation – a vein of equivocation pervading the whole so that its eventual culmination does little more than lead back towards the initial stasis. Its progress enroute is similarly reticent, though this was hardly the fault of the Danel who unfolded the overall design with unforced conviction. Nor did they underplay the plangency of the ending, with its anguished crying into the void.

Seven years earlier, Shostakovich had essayed an altogether more radical take on the single-movement format with his own Thirteenth Quartet. It is dedicated to Vadim Borisovsky, then violist of the Beethoven Quartet, and the viola is audibly ‘first among equals’ over almost its entirety. Nominally the darkest and most forbidding of this cycle, the hymnic lamentation of its outer Adagio sections is thrown into relief by the Doppio movimento central span whose jazz-inflected impetus is but its most fascinating aspect; added to which, those frequent taps onto the body of each instrument (which evoke a death-rattle or a rhythm-stick according to preference) readily accentuate a sense of time running out. Vlad Bogdanas made the most of his time in the spotlight, not least at the close as viola joins with violins to unnerving effect.

After the interval it was a relief to encounter the younger, resilient Shostakovich of his Piano Quintet. Its piano part conceived as a vehicle for himself, this marked the onset of a creative association with the Beethoven Quartet as lasted almost until the end of his life. It also finds the composer immersed in Bachian precedent – witness the powerfully rhetorical dialogue of piano and strings in its Prelude, then the severe yet never inflexible unfolding of form and texture in a Fugue whose abstraction is informed by a pathos the more acute in its restraint.

Playful and capricious by turns, the Scherzo makes for a striking centrepiece in spite (even because?) of its technical challenge. Suffice to add that François-Frédéric-Guy (above) and the Danel met this head on – after which, the Intermezzo mined a vein of soulfulness as was never less then affecting, while the Finale sounded more than unusually conclusive in the way it drew together aspects from the earlier movements towards a whimsical and even nonchalant close. At this stage, Shostakovich could still afford a measure of levity in his emotional response.

Thanks to Marc Danel’s acrobatics with a flying bow, the third movement stayed on course but it was no hardship to have this movement given even more scintillatingly as an encore. May 6th brings the penultimate recital in what has been an absorbing and revelatory series.

You can hear the music from the concert below, in recordings made by Quatuor Danel -including their most recent cycle of the Shostakovich quartets on Accentus:

For more information on the next concert in the series, visit the Wigmore Hall website. You can click on the names for more on composer Mieczysław Weinberg, Quatuor Danel and pianist François-Frédéric Guy

Published post no.2,467 – Saturday 8 March 2025

In concert – Isabelle Faust, CBSO / Kazuki Yamada: Akio Yashiro: Symphony, Shostakovich: Violin Concerto no.2 & Bartók Dance Suite

Posted on by
Reply

Isabelle Faust (violin, above), City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra / Kazuki Yamada (below)

Bartók Dance Suite BB86a (1923)
Shostakovich Violin Concerto no.2 in C sharp minor Op.129 (1967)
Yashiro Symphony for Large Orchestra (1958) [UK Premiere]

Symphony Hall, Birmingham
Wednesday 5 February 2025

Reviewed by Richard Whitehouse Picture of Isabelle Faust (c) Felix Broede

It may not have been a popular programme, but tonight’s concert by the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra drew a pretty decent attendance in music clearly to the liking of music director Kazuki Yamada, who duly gave of his best for what proved a memorable evening.

Often seen as a breakthrough work in terms of its fusing indigenous musical expression with Western formal conceits, Bartók’s Dance Suite makes an ideal concert-opener. At its best in the rhythmic propulsion or harmonic astringency of the second and third dances, the present account felt a touch inhibited elsewhere; Yamada making overmuch of rhetorical pauses that should motivate rather than impede ongoing momentum. Not that this precluded a forthright response from the CBSO, pianist James Keefe making the most of his time in the spotlight.

Although not now the rarity it once was, Shostakovich’s Second Violin Concerto will always lag behind its predecessor as to performance. Coming near the outset of its composer’s final decade, its inwardness and austerity belie its technical difficulties – though these latter were rarely an issue for Isabelle Faust, who kept the initial Moderato on a tight if never inflexible rein so its demonstrative outbursts and speculative asides were more than usually integrated. Even finer was the central Lento, muted anguish finding potent contrast with plangent solo passages, and a closing contribution from horn player Elspeth Dutch of subdued pathos. Nor was the final Allegro an anti-climax, Faust drawn into engaging confrontation with timpani and tom-tom then heading to a denouement with more than a touch of desperation in its hilarity.

Inquiring listeners may have encountered a recording in Naxos’s Japanese Classics series of a Symphony by Akio Yashiro (1929-76). One of the first group of Japanese composers to study in Europe after the Second World War, his limited yet vital output witnesses a determined and distinctive attempt to fuse certain native elements with the more radical aspects of timbre and texture stemming from the West. Messiaen (with whom he studied) is audible in the fastidious harmonies of this work’s Lento that, building from pensive melodies on flute and cor anglais into a threnody of real emotional power, is its undoubted highlight. Otherwise, the music feels more akin to that of André Jolivet (whose three symphonies deserve revival) in its abundant orchestral colour and predilection for rhythmic ostinatos that galvanize the musical argument.

Such is evident in the implacable unfolding of a Prelude whose motivic ideas secure a more purposeful accord in the ensuing Scherzo, while the finale draws upon the slow movement’s intensity as it expands over successive waves of activity to an impetuous Allegro of no mean velocity prior to a seismic, even brutal peroration. Whatever its intermittent lack of subtlety and cohesion, Yashiro’s Symphony remains an imposing musical edifice such as makes one regret that the composer never managed to pen its successor during his subsequent 18 years.

It certainly found the CBSO at its collective best, so making one hope that Yamada (above) might yet schedule pieces by such as Toshiro Mayuzumi or Sadao Bekku. His next concert has a rather more familiar symphony by Tchaikovsky in the orchestra’s annual Benevolent Fund Concert.

For details on the 2024-25 season A Season of Joy, head to the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra website. Click on the names to read more about violinist Isabelle Faust and the CBSO chief conductor Kazuki Yamada, and also the composer Akio Yashiro’s symphony

Published post no.2,438 – Friday 7 February 2025

Roll out the bunting…Arcana is 10 years old today!

Posted on by
Reply

From Ben Hogwood, Arcana editor:

If you’ll forgive the indulgence…Happy Birthday to us!

Arcana is 10 years old today, a chance to celebrate a decade of sharing great music with our readers. I would like to thank you all for your encouragement and interaction with the site, to thank our guest writers – principally Richard Whitehouse and John Earls – for their excellent contributions and insights in recent years, and to thank my wife Sam Hogwood for her unerring support. This is an enterprise that run outside of working hours, so it is inevitably a balancing act where time is concerned!

As part of our birthday celebrations, we have invited readers to contribute with their ‘watershed’ musical moments from the last 10 years. I’m looking forward to sharing them with you over the next few days; there are some crackers! It’s not too late to share yours either, by contacting me on e-mail (editor@arcana.fm)

In the meantime, here is an appropriate piece of music to mark the occasion – while at the same time giving a clue to what is upcoming on Arcana in the coming months:

Image by Alexander Raths

Published post no.2,428 – Saturday 1 February 2025

In concert – Quatuor Danel: Shostakovich & Weinberg #8 @ Wigmore Hall

Posted on by
Reply

Quatuor Danel [Marc Danel & Gilles Millet (violins), Vlad Bogdanas (viola), Yovan Markovitch (cello)]

Shostakovich String Quartet no.11 in F minor Op.122 (1966)
Shostakovich String Quartet no.12 in D flat major Op.133 (1968)
Weinberg String Quartet No. 12 Op.103 (1969-70)

Wigmore Hall, London
Wednesday 15 January 2025

by Richard Whitehouse Photo (c) Marco Borggreve

This latest instalment in Quatuor Danel’s traversal of the string quartets by Shostakovich and Weinberg comprised the Twelfth Quartets from both composers – masterpieces both, and was prefaced by the teasing brevity and obliqueness of the former’s preceding such composition.

His 60th year marked the onset of Shostakovich’s ‘late period’ – its overt introspection being appropriate for a piece dedicated to the memory of Vasily Shirinsky, former second violinist of the Beethoven Quartet who premiered all but the first and last of the composer’s cycle. In fact, the Eleventh Quartet is appreciably more varied than this memorial aspect may suggest – the Introduction initiating a subdued discourse given an ironic twist in the Scherzo then erupting combatively in the Recitative, prior to the anxiety of the Etude and ruthlessness of the Humoresque. This performance came into its own with the Elegy, a remembrance of enfolding pathos – after which, the Finale assumed that retrospective function found in many of Shostakovich’s later works with due emphasis on its stealthy and quixotic humour.

Just two years on brought Shostakovich’s Twelfth Quartet – if not his greatest then surely in the top two, while arguably uncharacteristic in its self-conscious yet masterly formal design. Although not introductory as such, the Danel was mindful to keep its opening movement on a tight rein such that its interplay of mood and tempo inferred without defining those seismic confrontations to come. This longest and most diverse of its composer’s quartet movements did not disappoint – the Danel having fullest measure of an 18-minute span whose eventual subsiding presages a pizzicato-driven assault the more visceral for being so methodical in its unfolding. Nor was the allusion to initial material at all misconstrued as this work enters its climactic phase, a transformation whose unbridled affirmation was powerfully in evidence.

It might have emerged barely 18 months on, but Weinberg’s Twelfth Quartet feels comparable only in its scope and ambition. A likely response to the creative radicalism this composer had encountered on returning to his native Poland after over a quarter-century, its four movements essentially reinvent the Classical archetype so that the opening Largo outlines a succession of amorphous or disruptive elements with little audible regard for just how they might interact – something that will only come into focus as the work unfolds while opening-out expressively.

This evolution takes in a stealthy if always speculative Allegretto, and a Presto whose violence has become assaultive by its close. It remains for the final Moderato to effect closure through a synthesis almost improvisatory for all its formal rigour. Allied to this comes a dominance of playing techniques that does not intensify the music as drain it of all emotion and so reduce it to merest gestures by the end. A remarkable piece, even so, and a testament to its composer’s tenacity in the face of an unsympathetic, often antagonistic cultural climate at home or abroad.

Tonight’s impressive reading almost had to be abandoned as Gilles Millet’s bridge collapsed just before the end of the third movement, but his last-minute location of a replacement saw it resume to the close – an unexpected hiatus seemingly in accord with this extraordinary work.

You can hear the music from the concert below, in recordings made by Quatuor Danel -including their most recent cycle of the Shostakovich quartets on Accentus:

For more information on the next concert in the series, visit the Wigmore Hall website. You can click on the names for more on composer Mieczysław Weinberg and Quatuor Danel themselves.

Published post no.2,414 – Friday 17 January 2025